On The Edge with Keith Campbell
Vision and Leadership for Packaging
On The Edge with Keith Campbell

CalendarKeith's Travel Calendar

All this talk about sustainable packaging machinery - Are we being honest?

May 25, 2010

One of the world's packaging guru's asked my opinion this month on whether sustainability is now a factor and if it will become more so in packaging machinery evaluation and selection. By the time I had finished my response, I decided that I had something to share with my readers, although many may disagree with my conclusion. I think that all of this talk about sustainable packaging machinery is being intellectually dishonest with ourselves and with society.

When we talk about sustainable packaging machinery, we create an expectation for society that because we are focused on sustainability, we will achieve new and different outcomes. The talk, the press, the awards - all lead us to believe that we are doing something wonderful for the world. But consider the idea that my colleague expressed. No one has ever sought to acquire a machine that is more costly, less efficient, less reusable or more polluting than the one it replaces or the alternative machines available in the market. It's just that our vocabulary for making this better selection didn't use the term "sustainability" until now.

In other words, even though we have a new term to apply, the outcomes will remain the same as they would have been. In the natural course of machinery evolution, the newer generation of machines will be more efficient, perform better, consume less air and electricity, process lighter materials, take up less space, and use fewer resources. If they didn't, why would anyone buy them? On what other basis would machine builders compete with one another?

Total cost of ownership (TCO), in my opinion, remains the best proxy for measuring sustainability. TCO has always been the best determinate for packaging machinery selection. What's changed, except society's expectation that something has changed? In setting an expectation for change that won't occur, we are creating an environment for disappointment. We are being intellectually dishonest with ourselves and each other.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://ontheedgeblog.com/blog-mt1-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/196


Comments


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Keith Campbell
About Keith Campbell
Leaders learn from the past while looking to the future - and bring both to bear on the here and now. This is the philosophy that has steered Keith Campbell's 30+ years in manufacturing. It has worked for him in operations, maintenance, engineering, R&D, education, consulting and professional organizations--and now he's putting it to work for you--taking you to the edge of his thoughts on packaging operations.
Suggestions?
Is there some place, event or thing that Keith should check out? Send your suggestions to Keith>>
Get Updates Via Email.
The latest "On the Edge" news immediately. Subscribe to the newsletter here.
Consulting
Get the most out of your manufacturing technology.
Recent Posts

My Christmas List

Get-cha vs. Got-cha Culture

Can we repatriate manufacturing?

How many jobs can one technician create?

The PLC Charade

Yesterday's New Technologies, Today's Commodities

More progress on the education front

Embedded Robotics at Pack Expo

Tips for improving manufacturing productivity

Schools recognized for teaching PMMI competencies

Archives

Categories

Ethics

Europe vs. US vs. Asia

Innovation

Keith's Calendar

Machinery builders

Manufacturing

Mechatronics

Networking

New technology

OEE

OMAC

Packaging Industry

Pharmaceuticals

Productivity

Security

Standards

Sustainability

Technology Planning

Trade Shows

Training/education

Workforce Issues